{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["109年6月20日第7654次會議第一次專案小組紀錄","監察院糾正意見","邵琇珮筆錄譯文"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["120284","京華城","圖利","容積率","監察院","都委會","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["是否構成圖利重罪","監察院糾正意見之法律影響","行政處分（容積率調整）之對價關係與整體考量","都委會審核都市計畫之裁量權與合理性"],"legal_issues_raw":["都委會審核都市計畫之裁量權與合理性","是否構成圖利重罪","行政處分（容積率調整）之對價關係與整體考量","監察院糾正意見之法律影響"],"participants":["合議庭(對象)","張景森","柯文哲","檢察官","白仁德","辯護律師","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","柯文哲 (被提及)","邵琇珮 (被提及)","張景森 (被提及)","白仁德 (被提及)","檢察官 (被提及)","合議庭 (對象)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"辯方針對檢察官將案件積壓十一個月表示遺憾，並就都委會審核京華城案時考量之因素進行辯護。辯方主張，都委會委員在審核可行性與必要性時，並非僅機械式對照專案合理性，而是綜合考量土地歷史脈絡（如120284號地之爭議）、周邊環境、疫情影響及已建築之量體，不應將其簡化為圖利重罪。此外，辯方亦針對監察院之糾正意見及其涉及的政治因素提出初步意見。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}