{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0029.txt","chunk_index":29,"documents_referenced":["112年7月28日內政部函附監察院之報告","監察院調查報告糾正案文","臺北市土地使用分區管制自治條例","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例","都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法","都市計畫法"],"end_seconds":8855,"keywords":["京華城案","內政部","容積獎勵","政治干預","監察院","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["內政部對本案認定之立場轉變（由「合乎規定」轉為「有未恰當」）","本案參採都更容積獎勵之合法性","臺北市政府之細部計畫變更程序是否符合都市計畫法第24條","都市計畫是否可創設超過自治條例訂定之容積上限獎勵"],"legal_issues_raw":["臺北市政府之細部計畫變更程序是否符合都市計畫法第24條","都市計畫是否可創設超過自治條例訂定之容積上限獎勵","本案參採都更容積獎勵之合法性","內政部對本案認定之立場轉變（由「合乎規定」轉為「有未恰當」）"],"participants":["內政部次長花敬群","營建署長吳新修","發言者（未具名）","監察委員林勝峰","監察委員蘇立雄","簡素培","顏若芳"],"participants_raw":["發言者（未具名）","監察委員林勝峰","監察委員蘇立雄","內政部次長花敬群","營建署長吳新修","簡素培","顏若芳"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0029","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8555,"summary":"本段逐字稿描述關於京華城案之監察院調查過程及其與內政部之間函文往來的時間線。發言者指出，內政部最初於112年7月28日回函監察院表示本案並未違反相關法令，且針對都市計畫法第24條之程序、容積獎勵之合法性及參採都更容積獎勵等問題均回覆為「合乎規定」或「合法」。然而，隨後在112年9月13日監察院約詢內政部官員後，內政部之立場於112年10月3日轉向，認為「有未恰當」之處，且此過程與113年1月之政治記者會及總統大選時間點高度重疊，發言者強調本案具有政治脈絡。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0029.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0029.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0029","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0029/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0029/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0029/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}