{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0030.txt","chunk_index":30,"documents_referenced":["臺北市土地使用分區管制自治條例","臺北市政府113年3月19日回函","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例","都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法","都市計畫審議原則第八點"],"end_seconds":9150,"keywords":["依法行政","內政部","容積獎勵","政治操作","監察院","都市更新","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["本案是否違背都市計畫審議原則第八點","行政機關（內政部）變更法律見解之正當性及其對行政判斷之影響","都市計畫容積獎勵是否逾越《臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例》及《臺北市土地使用分區管制自治條例》","非都市更新案件是否能準用《都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法》之規定"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫容積獎勵是否逾越《臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例》及《臺北市土地使用分區管制自治條例》","非都市更新案件是否能準用《都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法》之規定","本案是否違背都市計畫審議原則第八點","行政機關（內政部）變更法律見解之正當性及其對行政判斷之影響"],"participants":["合議庭","內政部","林欽榮","發言者","監察院","臺北市政府","都委會公務員","都發局公務員"],"participants_raw":["發言者","內政部","臺北市政府","監察院","都發局公務員","都委會公務員","林欽榮","合議庭"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0030","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8850,"summary":"本段文字討論關於臺北市某項都市計畫容積獎勵案件的合法性爭議。發言者指出，內政部最初認為該案引用相關獎勵規定並無逾越法令，但在112年9月13日約詢會議後，內政部的見解發生180度轉向，導致監察院採取不同結論。發言者質疑此過程涉及政治操作，並強調承辦公務員均認為本案依法行政、絕對合法，認為此案是被政治監察權扭曲的行政判斷案件。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0030.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0030.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0030","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0030/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0030/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0030/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}