{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0031.txt","chunk_index":31,"documents_referenced":["都市計畫法"],"end_seconds":9445,"keywords":["依法行政","刑事犯罪","文官體系","行政裁量","都委會"],"legal_issues":["公務員依法行政之法律責任","行政裁量權與刑事犯罪之界限"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政裁量權與刑事犯罪之界限","公務員依法行政之法律責任"],"participants":["合議庭","柯文哲","甲官","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["被告柯文哲","辯護人","甲官 (被提及)","合議庭 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0031","session_date":"2025-12-17","session_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":9145,"summary":"辯護方針對被告柯文哲之行為進行辯論，強調其建立都委會公開透明制度之初衷，並指責甲官無視專家意見且在都市計畫法中增加非法限制。辯方主張若將行政裁量視為刑事犯罪，將導致公務員不敢依法行政，損害文官體系，並請求法院以無罪判決保障公務員之勇於任事。","video_id":"NDpqyQ8TlV0","raw_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/raw/chunk_0031.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NDpqyQ8TlV0/cleaned/chunk_0031.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0031","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0031/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0031/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NDpqyQ8TlV0:chunk_0031/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NDpqyQ8TlV0","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}