{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["12084號文","北高行107年字第1206號判決","方案4（細部計畫變更申請）","監察院113年1月16日糾正文"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["京華城案","信賴保護原則","北高行判決","容積獎勵","細部計畫","行政施壓"],"legal_issues":["京華城案之容積獎勵是否具備合法性與對價性","公務員在行政審核過程中是否受到高官及議員之不當施壓","北高行107年字第1206號判決之信賴保護原則適用","方案4之細部計畫變更是否為規避法院判決之手段","行政程序之「程式合法」與「結果合法」之區分"],"legal_issues_raw":["公務員在行政審核過程中是否受到高官及議員之不當施壓","京華城案之容積獎勵是否具備合法性與對價性","行政程序之「程式合法」與「結果合法」之區分","北高行107年字第1206號判決之信賴保護原則適用","方案4之細部計畫變更是否為規避法院判決之手段"],"participants":["張公務員","彭振聲","洪公務員","賴公務員","辯護人","邵琇珮","黃公務員"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","洪公務員","張公務員","黃公務員","賴公務員","彭振聲","邵琇珮"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"本段文字為法庭辯論內容，重點在於分析京華城案中公務員面臨的壓力與案件的違法性。內容揭露公務員內部對於該案由高官、議員施壓而被迫通過的看法，以及基層公務員試圖透過「技術性拖延」或保守措辭來表達反對。同時，辯方針對北高行判決指出，北市府無需回復12084號文之保障，而京華城採取「方案4」之細部計畫變更，實為在法院判決無需回復的情況下，試圖繞道取得容積獎勵。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}