{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0002.txt","chunk_index":2,"documents_referenced":["最高法院 90 年度臺上字第 7198 號判決","最高行政法院 103 年判字第 1321 號判決","都基法（都市計畫法）第13條、第24條、第27條","都更條例及都更獎勵辦法"],"end_seconds":890,"keywords":["圖利罪","容積獎勵","平等原則","法律保留原則","法規命令","行政處分","裁量濫用","都基法"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵是否違反法律保留原則","行政裁量權是否違反平等原則而構成圖利罪","都基法第24條之變更性質（行政處分 vs 法規命令）","非都更地區適用都更獎勵專案之合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵是否違反法律保留原則","都基法第24條之變更性質（行政處分 vs 法規命令）","非都更地區適用都更獎勵專案之合法性","行政裁量權是否違反平等原則而構成圖利罪"],"participants":["法官","發言人（原告/檢方律師）","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["發言人（原告/檢方律師）","法官（被提及）","辯護人（被提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0002","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":590,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論關於容積獎勵之合法性爭議。原告/檢方主張，依據都基法第二十四條變更之細部計畫屬於「行政處分」而非「法規命令」，因此不能作為給予容積獎勵的法令依據，此舉違反法律保留原則。此外，指控該案將都更專屬之獎勵專案適用於非都更地區，違反都更條例及平等原則，並引用最高法院判決說明濫用裁量權導致違反平等原則可構成圖利罪。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0002.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0002.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0002","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0002/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0002/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0002/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}