{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0004.txt","chunk_index":4,"documents_referenced":["監察院102年調查報告","監察院105年糾正案","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例（第5條、第6條、第7條）","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":1480,"keywords":["公共利益","實質審查","形式審查","監察院糾正案","都市計畫變更","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務員在審核都市計畫時對於「不當」或「有礙公共利益」之判定義務","監察院102年調查報告及105年糾正案之法律解釋","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例第5、6、7條之適用","都發局對都市計畫變更申請案之審查權限（形式審查 vs. 實質審查）"],"legal_issues_raw":["都發局對都市計畫變更申請案之審查權限（形式審查 vs. 實質審查）","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例第5、6、7條之適用","公務員在審核都市計畫時對於「不當」或「有礙公共利益」之判定義務","監察院102年調查報告及105年糾正案之法律解釋"],"participants":["劉秀玲","李德權","楊智勝","檢察官","蕭修佩","辯護人","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","檢察官","劉秀玲","黃景茂","蕭修佩","李德權","楊智勝"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0004","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1180,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論都發局在受理都市計畫變更申請時，應採取「形式審查」或「實質審查」的法律義務。控方主張根據臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例及監察院相關報告，都發局有責任審查計畫是否「不當」或「有礙公共利益」，因此應進行實質審查。文中提及該案件曾被三名不同人員（蕭修佩、黃景茂、李德權）攔阻三次，最終在市長追蹤下由副市長決定往上呈報。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0004.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0004.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0004","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0004/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0004/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0004/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}