{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0005.txt","chunk_index":5,"documents_referenced":["108年9月23日市長市政會議紀錄","都計法第二十四條","京華城陳情書/訴求"],"end_seconds":1775,"keywords":["京華城案","實體審查","研議","行政訴訟","都委會","都市計畫","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務員處理訴訟案件是否應遵循循訴訟解決原則，而非私下和解或研議","在行政訴訟進行中，行政機關將同一爭議案件再次送交都委會研議之合法性與必要性","都發局對都市計畫申請是否應履行實體審查義務（都計法第二十四條）"],"legal_issues_raw":["都發局對都市計畫申請是否應履行實體審查義務（都計法第二十四條）","在行政訴訟進行中，行政機關將同一爭議案件再次送交都委會研議之合法性與必要性","公務員處理訴訟案件是否應遵循循訴訟解決原則，而非私下和解或研議"],"participants":["吳順民","張應軒（陳辦人）","彭振聲","楊智晟","發言者（律師或檢方）","陳辦科","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["發言者（律師或檢方）","黃景茂（前都發局長）","彭振聲（前副柯文哲）","楊智晟","陳辦科","張應軒（陳辦人）","吳順民"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0005","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1475,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中，都發局在處理都市計畫變更（10284號案）時的審查職責，以及在案件已進入行政訴訟階段下，黃景茂局長為何仍提議將案件送回都委會「研議」的合理性與動機。發言者質疑專業公務員應循訴訟解決爭議，而非透過研議採取類似和解的手段，並對都發局在108年至109年間立場轉變之原因提出質詢。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0005.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0005.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0005","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0005/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0005/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0005/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}