{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["109年2月18日陳俊源訊息","109年2月24日都發局簽程（第一版與第二版）","109年3月10日柯文哲市長批示（速審速決）","109年3月17日市長交辦單","109年3月17日新華城陳情函","109年4月6日都發局上簽送研議文件","《都市計畫法》第二十四條"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["京華城案","利益輸送","研議方案","行政指導","速審速決","都市計畫法第24條","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務員專業意見被長官指示刪除或無視之行政違法性","市議員介入行政決策之權限與利益輸送疑慮","是否違反《都市計畫法》第24條之變更程序","行政機關在訴訟期間採取研議方案是否屬規避法律責任之對策"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否違反《都市計畫法》第24條之變更程序","行政機關在訴訟期間採取研議方案是否屬規避法律責任之對策","公務員專業意見被長官指示刪除或無視之行政違法性","市議員介入行政決策之權限與利益輸送疑慮"],"participants":["張藝軒(公務員)","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","楊智勝(公務員)","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["柯文哲 (柯文哲)","黃景茂 (都發局長)","彭振聲","應曉薇 (議員)","張藝軒 (公務員)","楊智勝 (公務員)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"本段逐字稿詳細描述了京華城案在109年初的研議過程。重點在於京華城試圖透過《都市計畫法》第24條變更都市計畫以避開訴訟，而北市政府內部在研議過程中，公務員原持不同意和解或研議之意見，但遭到都發局長黃景茂及柯文哲市長（透過便當會及簽呈「速審速決」）指示強行推進。文中特別提到黃景茂局長與市議員應曉薇之間存在密切的溝通時間線，且在與印議員會面後隨即蓋章同意研議，質疑其決策過程受外部影響。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}