{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["中泰賓館案件（對比案例）","南港輪胎案件（對比案例）","專家學者諮詢會議紀錄（10月12日）","西部計畫（公展版本與最終版本）","都更條例相關獎勵規定","都發局內部公文/研議紀錄"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["京華城","公共利益","司法性","容積獎勵","對價性","形式審查","西部計畫","都發局"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之「司法性」與「對價性」是否符合法規","審查程序是否僅為形式審查而忽略實質審查（公共利益評估）","是否涉及違法之私下和解或不當加速行政流程","行政審查之公正性與強度是否因政治壓力而降低"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政審查之公正性與強度是否因政治壓力而降低","容積獎勵之「司法性」與「對價性」是否符合法規","審查程序是否僅為形式審查而忽略實質審查（公共利益評估）","是否涉及違法之私下和解或不當加速行政流程"],"participants":["公務員","專家學者","局長","應曉薇","柯文哲","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["局長（都發局）","柯柯文哲","應曉薇議員","公務員","專家學者","辯護人"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"本段逐字稿分析都發局局長在處理「京華城」案件時，面臨來自市長（柯文哲）及議員（應曉薇）的政治壓力，導致審查強度降低且時效異常快速（僅一年，遠低於其他案件之六年至十年）。文中質疑該案在專家學者會議提出「司法性」與「對價性」質疑後，最終版本仍缺乏回饋方案，且部分獎勵額度與都更條例重複，涉嫌違反審查原則及公共利益。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}