{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0013.txt","chunk_index":13,"documents_referenced":["一二〇二八四五（相關案號/文號）","大法官釋字第417號","大法官釋字第420號","李德權之論文及證詞","都市更新條例","都市計畫法第24條","京華城相關方案（方案一至四）"],"end_seconds":4135,"keywords":["京華城","依法行政","容積獎勵","法律保留","法規命令","細部計畫","行政處分","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵是否屬於法律保留事項","行政行為是否符合依法行政原則及法律優位原則","都市計畫法第24條之適用範圍","都市計畫（通盤檢討）與細部計畫之法律性質（法規命令 vs 行政處分）","非都更計畫是否可比照都更條例給予獎勵"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵是否屬於法律保留事項","非都更計畫是否可比照都更條例給予獎勵","都市計畫（通盤檢討）與細部計畫之法律性質（法規命令 vs 行政處分）","都市計畫法第24條之適用範圍","行政行為是否符合依法行政原則及法律優位原則"],"participants":["李德權","柯文哲","發言者（檢方或原告代理人）","辯方（辯人）"],"participants_raw":["發言者（檢方或原告代理人）","辯方（辯人）","李德權（證人/學者）","柯柯文哲（提及之人物）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0013","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3835,"summary":"本段文字為法庭辯論內容，主要針對京華城案中容積獎勵的合法性進行爭論。控方（或發言者）主張京華城在非都市更新計畫下卻比照都更獎勵，涉嫌架空都更條例並違反法律保留原則；針對辯方引用之都市計畫法第24條、李德權證詞及大法官釋字第417、420號之解釋，發言者逐一反駁，強調容積獎勵涉及財產權，必須有法律授權，且本案之細部計畫缺乏法律依據，屬於特例且不合理。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0013.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0013.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0013","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0013/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0013/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0013/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}