{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0015.txt","chunk_index":15,"documents_referenced":["9月11日簽呈","9月2日簽呈","專家學者諮詢會議紀錄","都市更新相關法規/獎勵規定","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":4725,"keywords":["京華城案","公益性","容積獎勵","方案式構想","都發局總工程師","釋法性疑慮"],"legal_issues":["引用都市更新法規於非都更案件之釋法性疑慮","是否構成犯罪 (初步判定)","行政程序中關於公益性與公共性審查之缺失","都市計畫法第24條之適用性"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成犯罪 (初步判定)","引用都市更新法規於非都更案件之釋法性疑慮","都市計畫法第24條之適用性","行政程序中關於公益性與公共性審查之缺失"],"participants":["劉玉山","吳順民","嚴巴瑞","宋坤仁","應曉薇","林欽榮","邵琇珮","陳玉坤","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["邵琇珮 (都發局總工程師)","嚴巴瑞 (證人/觀察者)","吳順民","林欽榮","宋坤仁","陳玉坤","應曉薇 (議員)","黃景茂 (都發局局長)","劉玉山 (委員)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0015","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4425,"summary":"本段逐字稿分析臺北市都發局前總工程師邵琇珮在京華城案中的角色與參與過程。重點在於邵琇珮利用其職權與專業，建議採取「方案式」構想，並引導參考都市更新法規或都市計畫法第24條來尋求容積獎勵機制。儘管後續在會議中意識到非都更案件引用都更獎勵額度存在「釋法性疑慮」，但仍參與了後續的協調會及專家學者諮詢會議，且在公展階段被指稱未確實要求加強公益性方案。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0015.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0015.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0015","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0015/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0015/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0015/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}