{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["101年8月13日都市設計科變更文件","第八十條之二（相關法條）","都委會第七、八、九次會議紀錄"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["京華城","公益性","容積獎勵","對價性","法定容積率","都委會","都發局"],"legal_issues":["容積獎勵之法定依據及其上限（1.2倍）之適用性","是否適用都市計畫法或相關規定之第八十條之二（容積獎勵）","行政救濟訴訟之結果對本案之影響","開發計畫之「公益性」與「對價性」之認定與證明"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否適用都市計畫法或相關規定之第八十條之二（容積獎勵）","容積獎勵之法定依據及其上限（1.2倍）之適用性","開發計畫之「公益性」與「對價性」之認定與證明","行政救濟訴訟之結果對本案之影響"],"participants":["劉秀玲","彭振聲","胡芳雄","薛招姓","邵琇珮","黃書軒"],"participants_raw":["劉秀玲","胡芳雄","黃書軒","邵琇珮","彭振聲","薛招姓委員"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"本段對話討論關於京華城案在都發局與都委會審議過程中的爭議，重點在於都發局未能正面回應關於「公益性」與「對價性」的質詢，且在容積獎勵的適用（如第八十條之二）上缺乏說明。會議紀錄顯示，當時在市長與副市長的壓力下，案件處理速度極快，且在審議過程中，邵總工雖解釋法定容積率，但未正面說明公益性之依據，導致委員對對價性評估資料缺失表示質疑。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}