{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0018.txt","chunk_index":18,"documents_referenced":["通訊軟體對話紀錄 (陳俊源與朱亞虎)","都委會審議紀錄","都市計畫法第 24 條","都發局審查意見"],"end_seconds":5610,"keywords":["京華城案","容積獎勵","對價性","平等原則","通案性","都委會","都市計畫變更","都發局"],"legal_issues":["公務員執行職務是否違反公平性","容積獎勵的對價性與合法性","是否涉嫌違法協助個案量身打造容獎條件","證詞之證據能力（有無不正訊問或違反自由意志）","都市計畫變更是否符合通案原則與平等原則"],"legal_issues_raw":["容積獎勵的對價性與合法性","都市計畫變更是否符合通案原則與平等原則","公務員執行職務是否違反公平性","是否涉嫌違法協助個案量身打造容獎條件","證詞之證據能力（有無不正訊問或違反自由意志）"],"participants":["吳文鎮","嚴禮方案師","彭振聲","應曉薇","朱亞虎","柯文哲","邵琇珮","陳俊源"],"participants_raw":["邵琇珮 (邵琇珮)","彭振聲 (副柯文哲)","柯文哲 (柯文哲)","應曉薇","嚴禮方案師","陳俊源","朱亞虎","吳文鎮"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0018","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5310,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要討論京華城案中關於容積獎勵（容獎）的合法性、通案性與對價性爭議。內容涵蓋邵總工在審查過程中忽略對價性評估、無視公務員對通案性與公平性的質疑，以及在都委會審議中未正面回應合法性疑問之行為。同時提及彭振聲副市長與柯文哲市長針對訴訟結果與容獎給予的對話，以及相關人員在行政流程中的角色與壓力。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0018.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0018.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0018","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0018/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0018/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0018/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}