{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0019.txt","chunk_index":19,"documents_referenced":["10284案回覆","10月27日簽呈","便當會決議","方案4（都發局與京華城共同研擬）","都委會審議意見/專家學者諮詢會議紀錄","陳情書（說明版）"],"end_seconds":5905,"keywords":["不法意識","京華城案","加速行政流程","圖利","容積獎勵","行政訴訟","都市計畫變更"],"legal_issues":["不法意識之認定（副柯文哲是否在明知有違法疑慮下仍推動流程）","圖利之嫌（是否違反公務員職務上之誠實義務或圖利他人）","行政程序之合法性（是否應循訴訟救濟而非行政研議補救）","都市計畫變更之違法性（是否違反既有權勢一致性原則）"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利之嫌（是否違反公務員職務上之誠實義務或圖利他人）","行政程序之合法性（是否應循訴訟救濟而非行政研議補救）","都市計畫變更之違法性（是否違反既有權勢一致性原則）","不法意識之認定（副柯文哲是否在明知有違法疑慮下仍推動流程）"],"participants":["張家綺","彭振聲","應曉薇","李德學","柯文哲","檢方/審理人員（敘述者）","白仁德","葉家園","邵琇珮","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["彭振聲（副柯文哲）","柯文哲","應曉薇","白仁德（委員）","黃景茂","邵琇珮","張家綺","葉家園","李德學","檢方/審理人員（敘述者）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0019","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5605,"summary":"本段逐字稿主要分析彭振聲副市長在京華城案中的角色與心路歷程。彭最初反對回覆10284案，認為行政訴訟勝訴後無需補救，且擔心不循訴訟程序處理會有圖利之嫌。然而，在柯文哲市長要求加速行政流程的壓力下，儘管彭已知悉方案4由都發局與京華城共同研擬、且意識到有違法疑慮及圖利風險，仍將簽呈呈報給柯文哲決心，而非予以退回，理由是該案具創設性且涉及重大都市計畫變更，應由最高行政首長決定。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0019.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0019.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0019","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0019/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0019/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0019/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}