{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["110年7月1日專案小組會議紀錄","3月18日第一次專案小組會議紀錄","4月11日便當會紀錄","劉秀玲陳情稿","提報單","第7834號會議紀錄（110年9月9日）"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["TOD模式","京華城案","圖管條例","容積獎勵","對價性","都基法第24條","都委會"],"legal_issues":["依據都基法第24條自行創設容積獎勵之合法性","容積獎勵之對價性（回饋與獎勵之對等關係）及其計算依據","是否能適用現行臺北市都市計畫法規（如圖管第80條之二）之爭議","突破容積上限之法理依據與司法風險","行政程序之公正性（如彭振聲副柯文哲擔任PM是否構成球員兼裁判）"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否能適用現行臺北市都市計畫法規（如圖管第80條之二）之爭議","依據都基法第24條自行創設容積獎勵之合法性","容積獎勵之對價性（回饋與獎勵之對等關係）及其計算依據","行政程序之公正性（如彭振聲副柯文哲擔任PM是否構成球員兼裁判）","突破容積上限之法理依據與司法風險"],"participants":["何","劉秀玲","宋","彭振聲","柯文哲","邵","郭","都發局","金應曉薇","京華城公司"],"participants_raw":["郭委員","宋委員","何委員","邵委員","柯柯文哲","彭振聲副柯文哲","劉秀玲","金應曉薇議員","京華城公司","都發局"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"本段逐字稿記錄關於京華城案爭議的審議過程，重點在於申請單位試圖突破現行都管法規、自行創設容積獎勵之正當性。內容涉及專案小組與都委會委員（如郭委員、宋委員、邵委員）對對價性、法理依據及公正性的質疑，以及柯文哲市長、彭振聲副市長在其中扮演的角色（如彭副市長擔任PM之爭議），最終討論到會議決議過程及對價性資訊不足的問題。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}