{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0021.txt","chunk_index":21,"documents_referenced":["本案細部計畫公告","行政訴訟判決書","都委會775次會議紀錄","都委會783次會議紀錄","都發局大簽蓋章呈報文件"],"end_seconds":6495,"keywords":["京華城案","圖利","對價性","程序正義","行政裁量權","都委會","都更榮獎"],"legal_issues":["圖利之指控","審議程序之正當性（是否缺乏對價性審查）","行政裁量權之行使是否適法","行政訴訟判決之影響","都更榮獎之釋法性疑慮"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利之指控","行政裁量權之行使是否適法","都更榮獎之釋法性疑慮","審議程序之正當性（是否缺乏對價性審查）","行政訴訟判決之影響"],"participants":["彭振聲","柯文哲","潘宜居","郭重英","都委會幕僚小組","陳明熙","高信","黃台生"],"participants_raw":["彭振聲（副柯文哲/都委會主席）","柯文哲","陳明熙（委員）","黃台生（委員）","潘宜居（委員）","郭重英（委員）","高信（委員）","都委會幕僚小組"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0021","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6195,"summary":"本段文字分析彭振聲副市長在京華城案中，於都委會審議過程中的角色與行為。重點在於其身兼 PM 與主席之雙重身分，涉嫌主導議題走向、忽略司法疑慮與對價性審查，並利用主席權限快速裁示通過，導致委員無法充分討論或表達反對意見。最後總結其六項涉嫌圖利之犯行，包括明知應駁回卻仍送審、引用有釋法疑慮之榮獎、以及在都委會會議中未就對價性進行實質審議而強行通過等。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0021.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0021.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0021","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0021/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0021/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0021/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}