{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0022.txt","chunk_index":22,"documents_referenced":["刑法","證人保護法","貪汙治罪條例","起訴書","辯護意旨狀（12月11日提交）"],"end_seconds":6790,"keywords":["依法行政","圖利罪","容積獎勵","服從文化","權勢干預","減輕其刑"],"legal_issues":["公務員是否違反依法行政原則","刑法第五十九條之酌量減輕","圖利罪之認定","權勢者對公務體系之干預與施壓","證人保護法第十四條第一項之減輕事由","貪汙治罪條例第八條第二項之減刑適用"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利罪之認定","公務員是否違反依法行政原則","權勢者對公務體系之干預與施壓","貪汙治罪條例第八條第二項之減刑適用","證人保護法第十四條第一項之減輕事由","刑法第五十九條之酌量減輕"],"participants":["彭振聲","檢察官","法官（三位）","證人劉秀玲","辯護律師（鄭律師）","邵琇珮","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["檢察官","法官（三位）","被告彭振聲","被告邵琇珮","被告黃景茂","證人劉秀玲（都委會執行秘書）","辯護律師（鄭律師）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0022","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6490,"summary":"本段文字為法庭辯論紀錄。檢察官強調本案核心在於「依法行政」原則是否受權勢者（如市長、議員）施壓而失效，指出公務員雖有專業疑慮但因服從文化而違心通過案件，請求法院判處被告邵琇珮、彭振聲、彭振聲、黃景茂圖利罪。隨後，被告邵琇珮之辯護律師陳述，被告坦承犯行，請求法院依《貪汙治罪條例》及《證人保護法》之減輕事由，以及其情狀可憫，請求減輕其刑並量處法定最低刑度。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0022.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0022.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0022","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0022/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0022/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0022/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}