{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0023.txt","chunk_index":23,"documents_referenced":["獎勵辦法","臺北市政府及所屬各機關處理人民陳情案件注意事項","行政程序法（第159條、第160條）","貪汙治罪條例（第六條）","起訴書"],"end_seconds":7085,"keywords":["單一犯意","對外法律效果","緩刑","行政規則","貪汙治罪條例","量刑辯論"],"legal_issues":["單一犯意與多數罪名之認定（單一犯罪事實 vs. 兩罪）","行政程序法第159條關於業務性、組織性、裁量性及解釋性行政規則之區分及其法律效力","行政規則（處理人民陳情案件注意事項）是否屬於《貪汙治罪條例》中對外發生法律效果之「法令」","被告行為是否構成《貪汙治罪條例》第六條之罪"],"legal_issues_raw":["被告行為是否構成《貪汙治罪條例》第六條之罪","行政規則（處理人民陳情案件注意事項）是否屬於《貪汙治罪條例》中對外發生法律效果之「法令」","單一犯意與多數罪名之認定（單一犯罪事實 vs. 兩罪）","行政程序法第159條關於業務性、組織性、裁量性及解釋性行政規則之區分及其法律效力"],"participants":["彭振聲","檢察官","法官","辯護人-黃禹松律師","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["法官","檢察官","被告-邵琇珮","被告-彭振聲","辯護人-黃禹松律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0023","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6785,"summary":"本段紀錄為法庭審理程序。首先處理被告邵琇珮之程序分離，隨後進入被告彭振聲之答辯階段。辯護人黃禹松律師代表彭振聲進行辯護，主張被告雖認罪，但就法律適用提出爭議。辯護人認為檢察官起訴之事實應區分為「陳情轉研議」與「西部計畫審議」兩個階段，並主張前者所涉之「處理人民陳情案件注意事項」屬於內部行政規則，不具對外法律效果，不符合《貪汙治罪條例》第六條之構成要件。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0023.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0023.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0023","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0023/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0023/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0023/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}