{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0024.txt","chunk_index":24,"documents_referenced":["彭振聲傳訊筆錄","最高法院判決","軍院 103 年度數字 460 號判決","都委會 7680 號會議紀錄","都法局新聞稿","高本院 110 重上更二字第 30 號刑事判決"],"end_seconds":7380,"keywords":["不法利益","圖利罪","平等原則","禁止規範","西部計畫","財產利益","陳情轉演義","類推適用"],"legal_issues":["圖利罪之「不法利益」是否僅限於財產上利益","行政行為（陳情轉演義）是否構成主管機關人員圖利罪之不法利益","違反平等原則是否必須以違背禁止規範或命令規範為前提","類推適用之要件（相似性與立法者是否有意省略）"],"legal_issues_raw":["圖利罪之「不法利益」是否僅限於財產上利益","行政行為（陳情轉演義）是否構成主管機關人員圖利罪之不法利益","違反平等原則是否必須以違背禁止規範或命令規範為前提","類推適用之要件（相似性與立法者是否有意省略）"],"participants":["彭振聲","檢察官","審判","苗伯雅","賴燕玲","辯護人","黃書宣"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","檢察官","苗伯雅 (證人)","黃書宣 (都委會幕僚)","賴燕玲 (都委會幕僚)","彭振聲 (被傳訊人)","審判 (法官/審理者)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0024","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":7080,"summary":"辯護人針對京華城公司在陳情轉演義階段是否獲取不法利益，以及在西部計畫審議階段的行為是否違法進行辯論。辯護人主張，陳情階段僅是獲得受理機會，不屬於財產上的不法利益；而在審議階段，由於缺乏明確的禁止性規範，且相關幕僚與證人亦表示無明顯違法之處，因此不應認定為違法。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0024.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0024.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0024","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0024/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0024/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0024/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}