{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0025.txt","chunk_index":25,"documents_referenced":["司法院釋字第 742 號（許志聰大法官協同意見書）","圖管條例","最高法院 102 年度第 3 次刑事庭決議（最高法院 102 年度刑議字第 1 號）","都市計劃法第 24 條"],"end_seconds":7675,"keywords":["不法利益","容積獎勵","平等原則","扣除說","法律保留原則","細部計劃","總額說","都市計劃"],"legal_issues":["不法利益金額之計算方式（扣除說 vs 總額說）","行政行為是否違反平等原則","都市計劃細部計劃之法律性質（屬法規或行政命令）及其外部效力","都市計劃變更與圖管條例容積獎勵之適用關係"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計劃變更與圖管條例容積獎勵之適用關係","都市計劃細部計劃之法律性質（屬法規或行政命令）及其外部效力","行政行為是否違反平等原則","不法利益金額之計算方式（扣除說 vs 總額說）"],"participants":["劉秀玲","檢察官","法官（庭上）","苗柏亞","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["辯護人","檢察官","法官（庭上）","劉秀玲（提及之證人/相關人）","苗柏亞（提及之質詢者）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0025","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":7375,"summary":"辯護人針對本案之都市計劃變更、細部計劃之法律性質（法規或行政命令）、是否違反平等原則，以及不法利益金額之計算方式（扣除說與總額說）提出法律論點，旨在反駁檢察官之論告。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0025.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0025.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0025","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0025/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0025/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0025/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}