{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["783號都委會會議決議","都計法24條","京華城110年7月23日及30日申請函"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["783號決議","事中共同正犯","京華城案","圖利罪","結果犯","行政行為"],"legal_issues":["事中共同正犯的加入時間點與責任範圍","圖利罪作為結果犯，其結果發生之時間點（783號決議）與前置行為之關聯性","行政行為的多階段性與刑法圖利罪之結果認定","行為獨立性對量刑之影響"],"legal_issues_raw":["行政行為的多階段性與刑法圖利罪之結果認定","事中共同正犯的加入時間點與責任範圍","圖利罪作為結果犯，其結果發生之時間點（783號決議）與前置行為之關聯性","行為獨立性對量刑之影響"],"participants":["辯護人/發言者"],"participants_raw":["辯護人/發言者"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-19","session_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"本段對話討論關於京華城案中，被告彭振聲是否構成圖利罪的法律爭點。辯方主張將行政程序視為多階段行為，試圖將 783 號都委會決議視為獨立事件，以縮短涉案時間區間，進而爭取降低刑度。同時討論了公務員與京華城目的之認知差異，以及「事中共同正犯」的加入時間點對責任認定之影響。","video_id":"NfrdKX5NBQc","raw_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/NfrdKX5NBQc/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/NfrdKX5NBQc:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/NfrdKX5NBQc","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}