{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0000.txt","chunk_index":0,"documents_referenced":["檢察官起訴書（提及之行賄流程圖）","陳秀桃之陳述內容"],"end_seconds":300,"keywords":["京華城","共犯","威京集團","政治獻金","明知","行賄"],"legal_issues":["共犯之認定（是否具有共同犯罪決議）","行賄罪之主觀構成要件（是否具備『明知』款項用途之故意）","被告職務權限與涉案公司（京華城）之關聯性"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄罪之主觀構成要件（是否具備『明知』款項用途之故意）","共犯之認定（是否具有共同犯罪決議）","被告職務權限與涉案公司（京華城）之關聯性"],"participants":["周晨憲（辯護律師）","審判長","張志澄"],"participants_raw":["審判長","張志澄（被告）","周晨憲（辯護律師）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0000","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":0,"summary":"本段紀錄為被告張志澄及其辯護人周晨憲律師之陳述。張志澄主張其僅係依長官指示捐款給民眾黨，並無行賄故意且不認識相關政治人物。辯護律師則針對張志澄是否具備行賄之「明知」及「共同犯意」進行辯論，並說明張志澄之職務範圍僅限於威京總部公司，並不涉及京華城之事務，旨在證明其與京華城案無直接關聯且不構成行賄共犯。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0000.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0000.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0000","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0000/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0000/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0000/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}