{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["張志澄 9月27日、9月30日、10月20日、10月22日、11月21日、12月9日之訊問筆錄","監察院京華城相關人員陳情紀錄","頂月公司得標標單（含放棄爭取更多容積之勾選）"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["京華城","共同犯罪","容積率","民眾黨捐款","行賄罪","頂月公司"],"legal_issues":["捐款行為與爭取容積率之間是否存在因果關係或對價關係","行賄罪共犯之成立要件（需具備明知及共同犯罪之決議）","被告張志澄是否具有行賄之主觀故意（明知是否為行賄）"],"legal_issues_raw":["行賄罪共犯之成立要件（需具備明知及共同犯罪之決議）","被告張志澄是否具有行賄之主觀故意（明知是否為行賄）","捐款行為與爭取容積率之間是否存在因果關係或對價關係"],"participants":["周政文","張志澄","朱亞虎","柯文哲","沈慶京","洪秀鳳","陳俊源","陳秀桃","陳秀鳳"],"participants_raw":["張志澄","陳秀鳳","陳秀桃","柯柯文哲","周政文","沈慶京","朱亞虎","陳俊源","洪秀鳳"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"本段文字主要討論被告張志澄是否構成行賄罪共犯。辯方主張張志澄僅在財務部門負責，對京華城容積率爭議之後續進展並不知情，且其捐款給民眾黨之動機僅為支持政黨成立，並非為了行賄以爭取容積率。文中詳細列舉張志澄多次筆錄之一致說法，強調其缺乏行賄之主觀明知及與其他被告（沈慶京、朱亞虎、陳俊源）之共同犯罪決議。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}