{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0003.txt","chunk_index":3,"documents_referenced":["12月10日偵查筆錄","9月及11月偵查筆錄","審理階段之庭審筆錄"],"end_seconds":1185,"keywords":["主觀犯意","人頭捐款","筆錄可信度","行賄罪","證詞矛盾"],"legal_issues":["被告張志澄是否具有行賄之主觀犯意","認罪之自白是否係基於壓力或推測而非事實","證人朱亞虎證詞之可信度與一致性","證據之採信（筆錄之片面採信問題）"],"legal_issues_raw":["被告張志澄是否具有行賄之主觀犯意","證人朱亞虎證詞之可信度與一致性","證據之採信（筆錄之片面採信問題）","認罪之自白是否係基於壓力或推測而非事實"],"participants":["張志澄","朱亞虎","檢察官","沈慶京","辯方律師(陳述者)"],"participants_raw":["檢察官","朱亞虎 (證人/被告)","張志澄 (被告)","沈慶京","辯方律師 (陳述者)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0003","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":885,"summary":"辯方針對證人朱亞虎之證詞可靠性提出質疑，主張檢察官試圖透過12月10日的筆錄建構被告張志澄之主觀犯意。辯方指出朱亞虎關於捐款時序的說法與客觀事實不符，且其在偵查與審理階段的陳述前後矛盾、反覆變更。此外，辯方強調朱亞虎認罪係基於個人推測及受檢察官施壓，而非基於事實，因此其指稱張志澄知悉行賄目的之證詞不應採信。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0003.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0003.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0003","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0003/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0003/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0003/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}