{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0004.txt","chunk_index":4,"documents_referenced":["10月11日偵訊筆錄","12月10日筆錄","9月27日偵訊筆錄"],"end_seconds":1480,"keywords":["120284","捐款","樓地板面積","民眾黨","行賄","誘導認罪"],"legal_issues":["偵訊過程中是否存在誘導認罪之情事","捐款是否構成行賄","捐款與120284號案件（樓地板面積）之因果關係","筆錄之可信度與證據能力"],"legal_issues_raw":["捐款是否構成行賄","捐款與120284號案件（樓地板面積）之因果關係","偵訊過程中是否存在誘導認罪之情事","筆錄之可信度與證據能力"],"participants":["張志澄","律師","朱亞虎","柯文哲","檢察官","陳慶虎"],"participants_raw":["朱亞虎","檢察官","律師","張志澄","柯文哲","陳慶虎"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0004","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1180,"summary":"本段文字分析朱亞虎在偵訊過程中的陳述演變。辯方主張朱亞虎最初否認行賄，認為210萬捐款是為了感謝560或支持民眾黨成立，並非與120284號案件之樓地板面積有關。然而，在檢察官與律師的誘導及壓力下，朱亞虎最終在筆錄中認罪並接受捐款與樓地板面積有關的說法。辯方質疑該筆錄內容並非基於朱亞虎的真實認知，而是檢方與律師合力誘導之結果。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0004.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0004.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0004","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0004/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0004/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0004/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}