{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["樓地板面積工作小組名單","獎金發放名單","獎金簽呈 (提及 560 及 678.91 之獎勵)","記事本"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["京華城案","容積率","明實不符","樓地板面積","犯罪所得","獎金"],"legal_issues":["檢察官對於獎金名義與實際行為之認定是否存在矛盾（雙重標準）","被告張志澄是否參與京華城案之樓地板面積及容積率爭取過程","領取獎金是否可作為參與非法行為或獲取犯罪所得之證據"],"legal_issues_raw":["被告張志澄是否參與京華城案之樓地板面積及容積率爭取過程","領取獎金是否可作為參與非法行為或獲取犯罪所得之證據","檢察官對於獎金名義與實際行為之認定是否存在矛盾（雙重標準）"],"participants":["劉子安","吳採仙","張志澄","檢察官","蔡沛倩","蘇玉珍","銅中白","阮信朗","陳俊源","陳孝桃","陳育昆","黃書文"],"participants_raw":["張志澄 (被告)","檢察官","陳俊源","黃書文","陳孝桃","陳育昆","阮信朗","蘇玉珍","蔡沛倩","吳採仙","銅中白","劉子安"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"辯方針對被告張志澄是否參與京華城案之容積率及樓地板面積爭取進行辯護。辯方主張張志澄未參與相關工作小組，且其領取的獎金與檢察官指稱的「爭取容積率有功」之簽呈名義不符，指出獎金發放名單與實際捐款名單不一致，且多位領獎人員（如陳俊源、黃書文等）之實際工作內容與簽呈名義不符，以此質疑檢察官在認定張志澄與陳俊源之罪責時採取雙重標準，缺乏客觀證據。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}