{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["偵查筆錄","朱亞虎筆錄 (12月10日)","證金署移送書 (12月9日)","起訴書"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["五四三","京華城案","惡意擷取","證金署","賄賂合意"],"legal_issues":["2月20日會面是否構成賄賂契約之合意","張志澄是否具有主觀明知及協助犯罪之意圖","檢察官起訴書之證據擷取是否具備完整性與公正性","證金署移送名單與地檢署起訴名單之差異"],"legal_issues_raw":["張志澄是否具有主觀明知及協助犯罪之意圖","檢察官起訴書之證據擷取是否具備完整性與公正性","證金署移送名單與地檢署起訴名單之差異","2月20日會面是否構成賄賂契約之合意"],"participants":["張志澄","房阿森","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","洪秀鳳","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","張志澄 (被告)","柯文哲 (被告)","沈慶京 (被告)","檢察官","洪秀鳳 (證人/相關人)","房阿森 (提及之人物)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"辯護律師針對被告張志澄之無罪主張進行辯論，強調其領取的獎金與本案涉案金額無關，且對話內容被檢察官惡意擷取，並指出證金署在移送時已排除張志澄。同時，律師針對2月20日柯文哲與沈慶京的會面內容進行說明，主張雙方僅在閒聊（五四三、風花雪月），並未達成賄賂合意，且批評沈慶京在庭上的陳述偏離主題。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}