{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0009.txt","chunk_index":9,"documents_referenced":["捐款簽呈","朱亞虎筆錄","軍院合議庭回函"],"end_seconds":2955,"keywords":["京華城案","政治獻金","樓地板面積","行賄","證據能力","頭人捐款"],"legal_issues":["找他人代為捐款是否證明有掩蓋行賄之犯意","捐款行為是否構成行賄之對價","捐款行為是否違反《政治獻金法》及其與本案行賄罪之關聯","是否於2月20日就京華城樓地板面積達成行賄合意","相關簡訊內容是否可視為行賄之證據"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否於2月20日就京華城樓地板面積達成行賄合意","捐款行為是否構成行賄之對價","找他人代為捐款是否證明有掩蓋行賄之犯意","捐款行為是否違反《政治獻金法》及其與本案行賄罪之關聯","相關簡訊內容是否可視為行賄之證據"],"participants":["合議庭","審判長","張哲揚","張志澄","朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","蔡碧如","辯方律師","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","柯文哲","朱亞虎","檢察官","審判長","沈慶京","張志澄","李文宗","蔡碧如","張哲揚","黃景茂","合議庭"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0009","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2655,"summary":"辯方針對檢方指控柯文哲於2月20日就京華城案達成行賄合意之主張進行反駁。辯方主張檢方推論缺乏根據，且朱亞虎之證詞不可靠，並說明捐款行為係因公司虧損而找他人代捐，並非為了掩飾行賄。此外，針對相關簡訊內容，辯方主張其僅為朱亞虎個人示好，並無涉及樓地板面積或金錢交易之意圖。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0009.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0009.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0009","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0009/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0009/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0009/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}