{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0010.txt","chunk_index":10,"documents_referenced":["卷證","簡訊內容","都發局發函（3月27日）"],"end_seconds":3250,"keywords":["京華城案","對價關係","收賄","政治獻金","無罪判決","行賄"],"legal_issues":["210萬元款項之性質認定（政治獻金 vs. 行賄款項）","職務行為與款項之間是否存在對價關係","行賄者與受賄者之間是否存在對價之相當性","被告是否具有收賄之主觀故意"],"legal_issues_raw":["210萬元款項之性質認定（政治獻金 vs. 行賄款項）","職務行為與款項之間是否存在對價關係","被告是否具有收賄之主觀故意","行賄者與受賄者之間是否存在對價之相當性"],"participants":["周律師","審判長","朱亞虎","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","陳律師"],"participants_raw":["審判長","周律師","陳律師","檢察官（提及）","朱亞虎（提及）","柯文哲（被告，提及）","沈慶京（提及）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0010","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":2950,"summary":"辯護律師針對被告（柯文哲）涉嫌收受210萬元賄賂之指控進行辯論。律師主張該筆款項為政治獻金而非行賄，並從時序邏輯（匯款時間早於職務行為）、對價關係（金額與利益不相當）以及主觀意識（無行賄與收賄意圖）三個面向反駁檢方指控，請求法院判決無罪。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0010.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0010.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0010","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0010/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0010/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0010/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}