{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0011.txt","chunk_index":11,"documents_referenced":[],"end_seconds":3545,"keywords":["共犯","對價關係","收賄","無償委任","白手套","行賄","顧問報酬"],"legal_issues":["是否構成行賄或收賄之共犯","被告於微經集團領取之顧問費是否為行賄之對價（白手套爭議）","被告是否代為行使議員職權施壓公務員","被告與應議員之間是否為主從關係或共犯關係"],"legal_issues_raw":["是否構成行賄或收賄之共犯","被告與應議員之間是否為主從關係或共犯關係","被告於微經集團領取之顧問費是否為行賄之對價（白手套爭議）","被告是否代為行使議員職權施壓公務員"],"participants":["吳順民","審判長","張志澄，由辯護人代理陳述","辯護人"],"participants_raw":["審判長","辯護人","被告（吳順民）","被告（張志澄，由辯護人代理陳述）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0011","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":3245,"summary":"本段逐字稿為被告張志澄（或吳順民，文中提及兩名被告）及其辯護人的最後辯論。辯護人強調被告為人守法，並以歷史冤案提醒法院審慎判決；被告吳順民則陳述其在應議員處擔任志工之單純動機，否認與應議員存在主從關係，並主張其在微經集團擔任顧問之報酬為勞務對價，而非行賄之白手套，否認收賄或協助行賄之指控。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0011.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0011.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0011","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0011/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0011/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0011/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}