{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0021.txt","chunk_index":21,"documents_referenced":["起訴書","都市計畫法第二十四條"],"end_seconds":6495,"keywords":["外部顧問","職權行使","行政指導","議員助理","金流","金華層案"],"legal_issues":["是否構成行使議員職權之對價關係","是否涉及收受賄賂、洗錢或擔任白手套","行政指導之合法性（都市計畫法第24條）","被告吳順民之法律身分認定（外部顧問 vs. 議員助理）"],"legal_issues_raw":["被告吳順民之法律身分認定（外部顧問 vs. 議員助理）","是否構成行使議員職權之對價關係","是否涉及收受賄賂、洗錢或擔任白手套","行政指導之合法性（都市計畫法第24條）"],"participants":["吳順民","應曉薇","沈科長","聯軍福（辦公室主任）","辯方律師（發言者）","邵琇珮","陳嘉明"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師（發言者）","吳順民（被告/顧問）","應曉薇（議員）","邵琇珮","沈科長（證人）","聯軍福（辦公室主任）","陳嘉明（助理）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0021","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":6195,"summary":"辯方針對吳順民之角色進行辯護，主張其僅為獨立的外部顧問，並非應曉薇議員的體制內助理，與金華層案之金流、權力運作無關。辯方強調吳順民僅收取合法顧問費並依法納稅，其參與案件進度追蹤屬個人自主行為，並非受指使，旨在反駁檢方將其定義為助理以建立「行使職權」之指控邏輯。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0021.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0021.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0021","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0021/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0021/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0021/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}