{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["LINE對話紀錄","偵訊筆錄","偵詢筆錄","錄音檔/錄音逐字稿 (卷 20 卷 399 頁)"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["京華城案","幽靈公訴","施壓","筆錄不符","誘導詢問","選擇性記載"],"legal_issues":["偵查筆錄之真實性與完整性（筆錄與錄音不符）","偵查過程中是否存在誘導詢問或施壓之情形","被告在京華城案中之角色定位（顧問、助理或指揮者）","被告是否對公務員採取施壓手段"],"legal_issues_raw":["偵查筆錄之真實性與完整性（筆錄與錄音不符）","偵查過程中是否存在誘導詢問或施壓之情形","被告是否對公務員採取施壓手段","被告在京華城案中之角色定位（顧問、助理或指揮者）"],"participants":["吳順民","張家文","林欽榮","胡芳瓊","蔡立瑞","袁正歡","辯方律師"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","吳順民 (被告)","胡芳瓊 (證人)","張家文 (證人)","蔡立瑞 (證人)","袁正歡 (偵查人員/相關人員)","林欽榮 (提及之人物)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"辯方針對被告吳順民之指控提出反駁，主張檢方偵查筆錄與錄音檔內容不符（幽靈公訴），指稱部分筆錄存在加油添醋、選擇性記載及誘導詢問之情形。同時，辯方透過LINE對話紀錄及證人（如蔡立瑞）之證詞，證明吳順民與公務員往來禮貌，並無施壓事實，且其參與都委會旁聽及便當會之行為屬正常權利或被動參與，並非指揮京華城案。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}