{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0030.txt","chunk_index":30,"documents_referenced":["《都市更新條例》第80條第2項","《都市計畫法》第24條","監聽譯文","臺北市113年2月27日發布之處理原則","都發局掛件收據"],"end_seconds":9150,"keywords":["不法對價","京華城","回饋容積","行政指導","都委會","都市更新條例","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["《都市更新條例》第80條第2項之適用與回饋容積計算","《都市計畫法》第24條行政指導之合法性與信賴原則","是否存在與市府高層勾結之不法對價關係","本案方案是否為先前案件（1120284）之補救或變形方案"],"legal_issues_raw":["《都市更新條例》第80條第2項之適用與回饋容積計算","《都市計畫法》第24條行政指導之合法性與信賴原則","本案方案是否為先前案件（1120284）之補救或變形方案","是否存在與市府高層勾結之不法對價關係"],"participants":["吳順民","檢察官","沈慶京","臺北市政府/都發局","趙秋佩","辯方律師/陳述人","邵琇珮","都委會"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/陳述人","吳順民","邵琇珮","沈慶京","趙秋佩","檢察官","臺北市政府/都發局","都委會"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0030","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":8850,"summary":"辯方針對京華城案之爭點進行陳述，主張不採取《都市更新條例》第80條第2項之原因在於該條文原規定不切實際（回饋比例過高），且公司係信賴市府依《都市計畫法》第24條所為之行政指導。同時反駁檢方將其視為先前案件之補救方案，強調兩者法律構成要件不同，且相關審議流程透明，無與市長、副市長勾結之情事。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0030.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0030.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0030","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0030/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0030/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0030/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}