{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0031.txt","chunk_index":31,"documents_referenced":["偵訊筆錄","公務員（楊志正、劉秀玲）之Line對話紀錄","圖管條例（都市計畫法實施細則/相關條例）","檢察官投影片（9月4日）","都市更新條例","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":9445,"keywords":["京華城案","刑事責任","容積獎勵","行政裁量","都委會","都市計畫法第24條"],"legal_issues":["是否存在欺騙都委會之犯罪故意（造假、偽造文書）","是否構成貪汙治罪條例之適用","行政裁量權與刑事責任之區分","都市計畫法第24條之適用與容積獎勵之合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫法第24條之適用與容積獎勵之合法性","行政裁量權與刑事責任之區分","是否構成貪汙治罪條例之適用","是否存在欺騙都委會之犯罪故意（造假、偽造文書）"],"participants":["法院（陳院長）","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","法院（陳院長）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0031","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","session_part":"下午","start_seconds":9145,"summary":"辯護律師針對京華城案進行最後陳詞，主張本案涉及的是都市計畫法第24條的裁量判斷而非刑事犯罪。律師指出，臺北市政府後續發布不再受理相關申請之原則，係屬「因噎廢食」；且公務員內部溝通顯示依都計法第24條申請容積獎勵有先例且合法。律師強調本案無造假、無欺瞞都委會之事實，僅涉及行政裁量之妥適性，不應將行政責任與刑事責任混淆，請求法院判決被告無罪。","video_id":"Q2uHOiwtENo","raw_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/raw/chunk_0031.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/Q2uHOiwtENo/cleaned/chunk_0031.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0031","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0031/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0031/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/Q2uHOiwtENo:chunk_0031/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/Q2uHOiwtENo","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}