{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0006.txt","chunk_index":6,"documents_referenced":["最高行政法院見解","監察院調查/糾正意見","臺北市都市計畫施行自治條例 第 25 條","都市計畫法 第 15 條","都市計畫法 第 22 條","都市計畫法 第 24 條","都市計畫法 第 26 條","都市計畫法 第 27 條"],"end_seconds":2070,"keywords":["京華城","公益性","容積獎勵","對價性","形式審查","細部計畫","都委會","都市計畫"],"legal_issues":["主要計畫與細部計畫在容積獎勵授權上之關係","行政處分與法規命令之區分及其對司法救濟之影響","都市計畫之公益性與對價性認定之權限與標準","都市計畫細部計畫是否可作為容積獎勵之法律依據","都發局在都市計畫審查中之形式審查與實質審查權限分界"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫之公益性與對價性認定之權限與標準","都發局在都市計畫審查中之形式審查與實質審查權限分界","都市計畫細部計畫是否可作為容積獎勵之法律依據","主要計畫與細部計畫在容積獎勵授權上之關係","行政處分與法規命令之區分及其對司法救濟之影響"],"participants":["楊智勝","法官","監察院","辯方律師/代理人","邵琇珮","都委會","都發局"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師/代理人","法官 (被提及)","都發局 (被提及)","都委會 (被提及)","監察院 (被提及)","邵琇珮 (都發局總工程師)","楊智勝 (都發局科長)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0006","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1770,"summary":"辯方針對都市計畫審查程序、公益性與對價性之認定、以及容積獎勵之法律依據進行辯論。重點在於主張都委會之專業判斷應受尊重，都發局之審查權限僅限於形式審查（依據監察院意見），並反駁法官對於細部計畫能否作為容積獎勵依據之法律見解，強調應保障人民提出細部計畫獲予容積獎勵之權利。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0006.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0006.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0006","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0006/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0006/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0006/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}