{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0007.txt","chunk_index":7,"documents_referenced":["內政部相關解釋函令","南港松山再生計畫","都市計畫定期通盤檢討實施辦法（第2條、第4條、第7條、第8條、第41條）","都市計畫法（第26條）","都更條例"],"end_seconds":2365,"keywords":["主要計畫","分割槽管制","容積獎勵","實績獎勵","細部計畫","通盤檢討"],"legal_issues":["主要計畫與細部計畫在容積率規定上的權限分工","細部計畫訂定容積是否必須獲得主要計畫之授權","給予容積獎勵是否必須經過都市計畫通盤檢討","都市計畫法中關於配合分割槽發展計畫之強制性（「得」與「應」之區分）","非都更地區參考都更條例實績獎勵之合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["主要計畫與細部計畫在容積率規定上的權限分工","給予容積獎勵是否必須經過都市計畫通盤檢討","細部計畫訂定容積是否必須獲得主要計畫之授權","非都更地區參考都更條例實績獎勵之合法性","都市計畫法中關於配合分割槽發展計畫之強制性（「得」與「應」之區分）"],"participants":["張景森","張莉莉","楊智勝","檢察官","陳志明","黃介威"],"participants_raw":["檢察官","楊智勝（都發局都市規劃科科長）","陳志明（北市府秘書長）","黃介威","張景森","張莉莉"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0007","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2065,"summary":"本段內容主要針對檢察官在都市計畫容積獎勵及細部計畫授權上的法律解讀提出反駁。辯方主張容積率通常定於細部計畫而非主要計畫，且給予容積獎勵不必然需要主要計畫授權或經過通盤檢討。同時，針對參考都更條例之實績獎勵及是否必須配合分割槽發展計畫之爭議，引用多位專家（楊智勝、黃介威、張景森）之觀點，認為檢察官對相關法令及實務操作存在誤解。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0007.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0007.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0007","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0007/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0007/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0007/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}