{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0008.txt","chunk_index":8,"documents_referenced":["京華城向都委會之簡報","臺北市都市計畫案件審理事項處理原則","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":2660,"keywords":["京華城","南松山再生計畫","容積獎勵","法定程序","行賄","都市更新","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["是否涉及行賄及不法意圖之刑事責任","臺北市都市計畫案件審理事項處理原則之合法性與平等權爭議","都市更新獎勵之適用性","都市計畫法第24條之容積獎勵申請權限"],"legal_issues_raw":["都市計畫法第24條之容積獎勵申請權限","臺北市都市計畫案件審理事項處理原則之合法性與平等權爭議","都市更新獎勵之適用性","是否涉及行賄及不法意圖之刑事責任"],"participants":["合議庭","張莉莉","林洲民","梁智盛","沈慶京","白蘭德"],"participants_raw":["張莉莉","林洲民","梁智盛","白蘭德委員","合議庭","沈慶京"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0008","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":2360,"summary":"本段文字主要論述京華城案之都市計畫爭議。辯方主張該案位於南松山再生計畫的核心位置，具有帶動區域發展之公益性，且其爭取容積獎勵係遵循都市計畫法定程序。文中質疑臺北市政府於113年2月27日修改審理原則，禁止依都市計畫法第24條申請新增容積獎勵，導致臺北市民權利受損且與其他縣市不平等。最後針對沈慶京之指控，主張其係依循遊戲規則操作，無行賄動機，並提及早年捐地之歷史背景。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0008.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0008.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0008","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0008/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0008/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0008/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}