{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0011.txt","chunk_index":11,"documents_referenced":["《政黨法》","小陳150電子紀錄/表格","朱亞虎之簡訊","陳俊源之筆錄"],"end_seconds":3545,"keywords":["京華城案","政治獻金","民眾黨","無罪推定","行賄","電子紀錄"],"legal_issues":["政治獻金是否構成行賄之對價關係","政黨法人格與個人法人格之區分","無罪推定原則（罪證有疑，利益歸於被告）","電子紀錄（小陳150）之證據能力與真實性"],"legal_issues_raw":["政治獻金是否構成行賄之對價關係","政黨法人格與個人法人格之區分","電子紀錄（小陳150）之證據能力與真實性","無罪推定原則（罪證有疑，利益歸於被告）"],"participants":["吳梅壽","周俊吉","張高祥","朱亞虎","林志朗","柯文哲","王力寧","簡","蔡明星","郭","陳俊源"],"participants_raw":["簡法官","柯文哲","朱亞虎","陳俊源","王力寧","周俊吉","林志朗","吳梅壽","張高祥","蔡明星","郭檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0011","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3245,"summary":"本段逐字稿為辯方律師或法官針對京華城案及柯文哲涉嫌收賄之爭點進行陳述。重點在於質疑檢方將捐給民眾黨的210萬政治獻金視為行賄之說法，強調該款項受《政黨法》規範且非柯文哲個人支配；同時質疑朱亞虎簡訊之證據力，以及檢方提交之「小陳150」電子紀錄存在多處事實錯誤（如捐款時間、人物對應不符），主張該證據不精確，應適用「罪證有疑，利益歸於被告」之原則。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0011.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0011.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0011","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0011/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0011/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0011/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}