{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0013.txt","chunk_index":13,"documents_referenced":["99年6月7日內政部國土署函","偵查筆錄","卷證（第五卷、第六卷）","搜尋票","會議紀錄"],"end_seconds":4135,"keywords":["容積獎勵","法官定見","認罪任意性","證據能力","都市計畫","非人道待遇"],"legal_issues":["偵查手段之合法性與認罪之任意性","法官之審判公正性與定見問題","被告基本人權與非人道待遇（凌虐人犯）","證據能力之認定（偵查外紀錄與審判筆錄之優先順序）","都市計畫容積獎勵之法定程序與合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["偵查手段之合法性與認罪之任意性","證據能力之認定（偵查外紀錄與審判筆錄之優先順序）","法官之審判公正性與定見問題","都市計畫容積獎勵之法定程序與合法性","被告基本人權與非人道待遇（凌虐人犯）"],"participants":["合議庭","張立立","檢察官","沈慶京","法官","辯護律師（發言者）","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","沈慶京（被告）","合議庭（提及之人物）","張立立（被告/相關人）","黃景茂（相關人）","法官","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0013","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":3835,"summary":"本段文字為辯方對偵查過程及審理公正性的強烈質疑。內容涵蓋被告沈慶京遭受非人道對待（鐵鍊鎖於病床）、偵查手段高壓導致認罪任意性受損、法官對都市計畫容積獎勵之法律認定存在偏見且刻意隱瞞主管機關函令，以及指控檢察官在視察時對被告受虐情況漠視並採取威脅手段。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0013.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0013.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0013","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0013/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0013/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0013/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}