{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0014.txt","chunk_index":14,"documents_referenced":["刑事訴訟法第二條","搜索票","申請書"],"end_seconds":4430,"keywords":["京華城案","偵查權濫用","容積獎勵","無罪推定","職權行使","證據排除"],"legal_issues":["偵查過程中取得之證據是否合法（證據排除之爭議）","檢察官是否違反刑事訴訟法第二條關於有利不利證據一併注意之義務","無罪推定原則之適用","犯罪嫌疑重大與超越合理懷疑之確信之區分"],"legal_issues_raw":["檢察官是否違反刑事訴訟法第二條關於有利不利證據一併注意之義務","偵查過程中取得之證據是否合法（證據排除之爭議）","無罪推定原則之適用","犯罪嫌疑重大與超越合理懷疑之確信之區分"],"participants":["合議庭","審判長","被告","許律師","辯護律師"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","合議庭（法官）","審判長","被告","許律師"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0014","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4130,"summary":"辯護律師針對檢察官在偵查過程中的行為提出強烈質疑，指其涉嫌踐踏他人尊嚴、無視對被告有利之證據、在申請搜索票時提供與其法律確信相悖的陳述，以及未盡刑事訴訟法對於有利不利證據應一併注意之義務。律師請求法院排除不法取得之證據及高壓下之認罪陳述，並請求法官本於無罪推定原則，判決被告無罪。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0014.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0014.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0014","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0014/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0014/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0014/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}