{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0015.txt","chunk_index":15,"documents_referenced":["辯護要旨及簡報（位於甲六卷 343 頁）"],"end_seconds":4725,"keywords":["交保","社會公審","程序正義","羈押","辯護權","陳慶金"],"legal_issues":["審判權之獨立（質疑高等法院干涉原審性之裁定）","程序正義（社會公審、逼供、洩密之影響）","羈押之必要性與合法性（針對高等法院推翻交保裁定之爭議）","證據調查之充分性（羈押狀態對辯護權之影響）"],"legal_issues_raw":["程序正義（社會公審、逼供、洩密之影響）","羈押之必要性與合法性（針對高等法院推翻交保裁定之爭議）","審判權之獨立（質疑高等法院干涉原審性之裁定）","證據調查之充分性（羈押狀態對辯護權之影響）"],"participants":["合議庭","審判長","檢察官","辯護律師","陳慶金"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","審判長","合議庭法官","被告（陳慶金）","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0015","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":4425,"summary":"辯護律師針對被告陳慶金之案件發表辯護意見。律師指出被告在進入司法程序前已遭受社會公審，且在偵查與羈押階段存在檢察官逼供及向媒體洩密之情事，導致審判不公。律師質疑高等法院推翻原審交保裁定而維持羈押之做法不符法理，並強調長期羈押會使辯護方在證據調查上受限，且可能導致法院為求速結而影響審理品質。律師引用拉法葉案與王炳中案作為對比，主張應給予被告充分的答辯機會與證據調查時間。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0015.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0015.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0015","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0015/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0015/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0015/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}