{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0017.txt","chunk_index":17,"documents_referenced":["109年4月14日縮圖（非公訴證據96號、B13卷523-528頁）","109年4月6日都發局簽呈（非公訴證據95號、B13卷529-539頁）","A137工作部Excel表","《都市計畫法》第24條","朱亞虎109年4月1日簡訊","鏡週刊相關報導"],"end_seconds":5315,"keywords":["偵查秘密","圖利","政治綁架","社會公審","都市計畫法","都發局簽呈"],"legal_issues":["《都市計畫法》第24條之適用及容積獎勵之合法性","偵查過程是否受政治干預或媒體影響","圖利罪之構成要件（是否屬於違法圖利）","檢察官偵查程序是否違法（包含逼供、洩漏偵查秘密）"],"legal_issues_raw":["檢察官偵查程序是否違法（包含逼供、洩漏偵查秘密）","《都市計畫法》第24條之適用及容積獎勵之合法性","圖利罪之構成要件（是否屬於違法圖利）","偵查過程是否受政治干預或媒體影響"],"participants":["審判長","廖玉軍","林俊廷","柯文哲","法官","辯護律師","陳世力"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","審判長","法官","林俊廷（檢察官）","廖玉軍（檢察官）","陳世力（檢察官）","柯文哲（被告）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0017","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5015,"summary":"辯方律師針對本案提出強烈質疑，主張本案受到政治因素干擾及媒體社會公審影響，導致被告處境不公。律師批評檢察官偵查心態偏頗、取證草率，且指控檢方起訴書內容與特定媒體（如鏡週刊）報導高度雷同，質疑偵查過程洩密。此外，律師認為檢方對《都市計畫法》之適用與法律見解與實務脫節，並舉出都發局簽呈等證據證明檢方之假設性命題屬錯誤。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0017.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0017.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0017","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0017/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0017/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0017/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}