{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0020.txt","chunk_index":20,"documents_referenced":["120284 號案","《都市計畫法》第 24 條","甲 23 卷（第 278 頁、第 280 頁）","第 765 次都委會紀錄","第 768 次都委會紀錄","第 783 次都委會議事紀錄"],"end_seconds":6200,"keywords":["共謀","圖利","自白","逼供","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["共謀圖利之認定（是否具備共謀之事實與證據）","行政程序之合法性（關於都市計畫法第24條之申請變更程序）","證據之可採性（質疑自白是否係基於逼供或交易而取得）"],"legal_issues_raw":["共謀圖利之認定（是否具備共謀之事實與證據）","證據之可採性（質疑自白是否係基於逼供或交易而取得）","行政程序之合法性（關於都市計畫法第24條之申請變更程序）"],"participants":["彭振聲","朱亞虎","林俊元","柯文哲","沈慶京","辯護律師（發言者）","邵琇珮"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","柯文哲","沈慶京","彭振聲","林俊元（檢察官）","邵琇珮","朱亞虎"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0020","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":5900,"summary":"辯方針對檢方指控柯文哲與沈慶京共謀圖利一案提出反駁，主張在關鍵的都委會研議及協調過程中，柯文哲並未參與，且檢方依據之證詞（如朱亞虎之陳述）缺乏事實基礎。同時，辯方質疑彭振聲之自白是在檢察官林俊元的壓力或交易下取得，涉嫌逼供，其自白內容與事實不符，不應採信。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0020.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0020.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0020","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0020/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0020/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0020/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}