{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0022.txt","chunk_index":22,"documents_referenced":["專家學者諮詢會議錄音及議文","市政府公文","監聽內容及手機對話截圖","答辯要旨","被告及證人筆錄","證交法案件卷宗","都委會專案小組會議記錄"],"end_seconds":6790,"keywords":["不實陳述","借訊","容積獎勵","逼供","選擇性取證","都委會","都市計畫法"],"legal_issues":["偵查過程中是否存在逼供行為","檢察官借訊程序之合法性（是否向法院作不實陳述）","證據採取與論告之公正性（選擇性取證、斷章取義）","都委會審議過程之合法性與程序正義（容積獎勵、都市計畫法第24條之適用）"],"legal_issues_raw":["檢察官借訊程序之合法性（是否向法院作不實陳述）","證據採取與論告之公正性（選擇性取證、斷章取義）","偵查過程中是否存在逼供行為","都委會審議過程之合法性與程序正義（容積獎勵、都市計畫法第24條之適用）"],"participants":["嶽芳如（律師）","廖玉君","林俊廷","江長志","沈慶京","胡元榮（律師）","蘇律師（同伴律師）","辯護律師（發言者）"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","江長志（檢察官）","廖玉君（檢察官）","林俊廷（檢察官）","沈慶京（被告）","嶽芳如（律師）","胡元榮（律師）","蘇律師（同伴律師）"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0022","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":6490,"summary":"辯護律師針對檢察官江長志在借訊程序中涉嫌向法院作不實陳述（將本案辯護人誤稱為證交法案件辯護人）提出質疑，並指控檢察官廖玉君與林俊廷在論告時採取選擇性取證，刻意忽略對被告有利的客觀證據（如都委會會議紀錄、錄音等），且涉嫌逼供，試圖透過斷章取義的方式扭曲案件事實。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0022.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0022.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0022","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0022/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0022/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0022/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}