{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0027.txt","chunk_index":27,"documents_referenced":["109 年 4 月 1 日之簡訊","113 年 10 月 8 日訊問筆錄","113 年 11 月 7 日訊問筆錄","AE37 硬碟之工作簿 Excel 表"],"end_seconds":8265,"keywords":["Excel表","偵查程序","洩密","濫權追訴","證人污染","賄賂"],"legal_issues":["偵查過程中是否存在洩密行為導致證人陳述被污染","檢察官是否涉嫌刑法第 125 條濫權追訴","證人陳述之前後矛盾與可信度評估","起訴書中關於賄賂金額（210 萬元及 1500 萬元）之證據充足性"],"legal_issues_raw":["檢察官是否涉嫌刑法第 125 條濫權追訴","偵查過程中是否存在洩密行為導致證人陳述被污染","起訴書中關於賄賂金額（210 萬元及 1500 萬元）之證據充足性","證人陳述之前後矛盾與可信度評估"],"participants":["朱亞虎","李文宗","柯文哲","檢察官","辯方律師","邱佩玲"],"participants_raw":["辯方律師","檢察官 (被提及)","柯文哲 (被告/被提及)","邱佩玲 (證人/被提及)","朱亞虎 (證人/被提及)","李文宗 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0027","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":7965,"summary":"辯方律師質疑檢察官在偵查過程中涉嫌洩密，指稱檢察官將機密之 Excel 表格內容洩漏給媒體（如《鏡週刊》），導致證人邱佩玲在受訊問時，其陳述由原先的「不了解」變更為「肯定 Excel 表內容」，認為證人記憶已被污染。律師主張檢察官此舉涉嫌違反刑法第 125 條濫權追訴，並針對檢察官指控柯文哲收受賄賂（包含 210 萬元及 1500 萬元）之證據力提出強烈質疑，認為僅憑單一證人陳述或來源不明之表格不足以定罪。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0027.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0027.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0027","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0027/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0027/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0027/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}