{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0028.txt","chunk_index":28,"documents_referenced":["Excel表格","起訴書（第267頁）","都委會決議意見/建議稿","都市計畫法第24條"],"end_seconds":8560,"keywords":["主觀意圖","共犯","圖利罪","西部計畫","證據能力","都委會"],"legal_issues":["共犯圖利罪之成立與否","共犯範圍之認定邏輯","圖利之主觀意圖（明知違背法令）","圖利之動機（如恐懼被撤職）","證據之可信度（Excel表格、證人證詞）"],"legal_issues_raw":["共犯圖利罪之成立與否","證據之可信度（Excel表格、證人證詞）","圖利之主觀意圖（明知違背法令）","圖利之動機（如恐懼被撤職）","共犯範圍之認定邏輯"],"participants":["劉秀玲","張立立","彭振聲","應曉薇","柯文哲","檢察官","沈慶京","辯護律師（發言者）","邵琇珮","黃景茂"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師（發言者）","柯文哲","沈慶京","彭振聲","黃景茂","邵琇珮","應曉薇","張立立","劉秀玲","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0028","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8260,"summary":"辯方針對檢方指控柯文哲、沈慶京及相關官員（彭振聲、黃景茂、邵琇珮）共謀圖利之主張提出質疑。辯方質疑證據不足，認為僅憑一份來源不明的Excel表格及部分自白不足以證明犯罪事實；同時質疑圖利動機之合理性，並對為何僅起訴特定人員而排除其他都發局官員與都委會委員之邏輯提出異議，最後要求檢方提出被告明知違法而圖利的具體證據。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0028.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0028.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0028","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0028/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0028/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0028/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}