{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0029.txt","chunk_index":29,"documents_referenced":[],"end_seconds":8855,"keywords":["合理懷疑","收賄","施壓","無罪判決","證據連結","都委會"],"legal_issues":["刑事訴訟中「超越合理懷疑」之證明標準","檢察官指控之施壓行為與都委會決定之間是否存在因果關係","被告沈慶京是否指使他人施壓或存在收賄之共謀"],"legal_issues_raw":["檢察官指控之施壓行為與都委會決定之間是否存在因果關係","被告沈慶京是否指使他人施壓或存在收賄之共謀","刑事訴訟中「超越合理懷疑」之證明標準"],"participants":["吳順民","應曉薇","檢察官","沈慶京","法院(被請求)","辯護律師","京華城"],"participants_raw":["辯護律師","檢察官 (被提及)","法院 (被請求)","應曉薇 (被提及)","吳順民 (被提及)","沈慶京 (被告/被提及)","京華城 (被提及)"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0029","session_date":"2025-12-18","session_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":8555,"summary":"辯護律師針對檢察官指控應曉薇施壓官員影響都委會決定的邏輯提出質疑，強調並無證據證明都委會委員受到影響，且缺乏證據證明被告沈慶京指使應曉薇或吳順民施壓，或與其合議收賄，請求法院依據刑事證據法則判決被告無罪。","video_id":"X9M3axM1LIU","raw_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/raw/chunk_0029.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/X9M3axM1LIU/cleaned/chunk_0029.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0029","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0029/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0029/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/X9M3axM1LIU:chunk_0029/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/X9M3axM1LIU","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}