{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0001.txt","chunk_index":1,"documents_referenced":["法院證詞（公務人員與工程師之證詞）","監察院糾正文"],"end_seconds":595,"keywords":["京華城案","壓人取供","容積率","民意代表職權","都市計畫","陳情"],"legal_issues":["京華城案容積率認定之合法性","檢方採取之取訊手段是否涉及不正當壓人取供","民意代表處理陳情案件之職權範圍與正當性"],"legal_issues_raw":["民意代表處理陳情案件之職權範圍與正當性","京華城案容積率認定之合法性","檢方採取之取訊手段是否涉及不正當壓人取供"],"participants":["檢察官","民意"],"participants_raw":["被告（民意代表）","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0001","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":295,"summary":"被告針對京華城案進行陳述，主張其行為僅為民意代表之正常職權，即接受陳情並轉達給市政府處理，並強調其並非都市計畫專家，僅扮演協調角色。同時，被告質疑檢方對容積率認定之專業度，指控檢方扭曲事實、壓人取供，將本案政治化，並強調其行為具有正當性與合法性。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0001.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0001.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0001","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0001/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0001/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0001/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}