{"case_id":"113年度金訴字第51號","case_number":"113年度金訴字第51號","chunk_filename":"chunk_0005.txt","chunk_index":5,"documents_referenced":["檢察官論告書","財產申報資料（陽光法案）","起訴書"],"end_seconds":1775,"keywords":["京華城","便當會","收賄","服務案","財產申報","陽光法案"],"legal_issues":["收賄指控之有無","職務行為（召開協調會、便當會）是否構成對特定案件之利益輸送","財產來源之合法性"],"legal_issues_raw":["收賄指控之有無","財產來源之合法性","職務行為（召開協調會、便當會）是否構成對特定案件之利益輸送"],"participants":["前","審判長","檢察官"],"participants_raw":["被告（前議員）","審判長","檢察官"],"phase":"言詞辯論","record_type":"segment","segment_id":"koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0005","session_date":"2025-12-24","session_id":"koSUntQfpmY","session_part":"上午","start_seconds":1475,"summary":"被告針對收賄指控進行辯護，主張其擁有充足的合法收入來源（含議會薪資、債權回收、房租及子女撫養費），足以支應生活與房貸，且財產申報透明。被告否認收賄動機，並說明信用卡帳戶之款項為支付女兒留學費用之押金。此外，被告強調其議員任內服務案件眾多，涉及京華城之陳情案僅佔極小比例，其召開協調會與便當會係基於議員職責，並非為特定目的協助京華城。","video_id":"koSUntQfpmY","raw_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/raw/chunk_0005.txt","cleaned_text_key":"text/koSUntQfpmY/cleaned/chunk_0005.txt","_links":{"self":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0005","read":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0005/read","raw":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0005/raw","cleaned":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/segments/koSUntQfpmY:chunk_0005/cleaned","session":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/sessions/koSUntQfpmY","case":"https://5pwpri46fd.execute-api.ap-east-2.amazonaws.com/cases/113年度金訴字第51號"}}